Due to my temp job at a mall, I have made the prolonged observation that bi and gay people seem to have more of an added acuity in being more connected, sensitive, aware and empathizing towards other people, which makes them polite/respectful and caring individuals compared to straight people. This is confirmed all the time, even for some irritating gay people who hit on me.
Bi and gay people have both the masculine/aggression and feminine/passiveness qualities in them, It seems as though such both qualities cooperated together within a person would combine to form a wholesome kind of greater awareness.
In comparison, straight people seem to be a little adequate. They seem to be missing something, which makes them seem a little "lost" and disconnected to reality and other people.
Bi and gay people remind me of Counselor Troi In Star Trek who is an empath, they are empathetic like her and behave just like her. It is as though bi and gay people are being close to becoming empaths who can read minds. Perhaps they are close on their spiritual evolution in reaching such a psychic state.
Bi and gay people make very close and strong eye contact as if they have very strong focusing power in their consciousness. On the other hand, straight people lack the mental power in establishing such a connection. Perhaps the souls in straight people are not yet ready to take on such a state of being(bi and gay) that requires a stronger operating consciousness.
The heightened masculine/domination quality enables a person to expand the consciousness to reach far out to interpret reality beyond the scope of the self, while the feminine/passive quality enables one to feel and interpret the various aspects in reality. Because straight people are not heightened in both qualities, their consciousness is limited to just interpreting and feeling mostly their own needs.
Having children enables straight people the opportunity to CARE MORE for other people, and also to give them the opportunity to expand their sensitivity, connectivity, empathy etc that can help them to become more caring and respectful individuals.
The reason why straight people need to have children is because their souls need more experience in experiencing the masculine/domination and feminine/passive qualities from their children.
Many rigid and serious adults change and behave like kiddish retards when they look at small cute kids and babies, they temporarily become more passive. This just shows that they need kids to help them become more passive and connected to other people. For bi and gay people, they don't change when they interact with babies and kids, they remain in their friendly and caring self when they behave around kids.
The reason gay people don't need to have kids is because they don't need more assistance in experiencing more feminine/passive or masculine/dominating qualities.
Many straight dominating dads are more feminine/passive due to having children, many passive moms have become more masculine/dominating due to having children as well. Cooperating the feminine and masculine within parents would no doubt enable them to become more empathetic towards others, especially when parents discovers that their children are bi or gay and have to accept their kids as being normal.
So it is obvious to me that straight people have children because they still need much experience with the masculine/domination and feminine/passive.
So when some straight people think less of bi and gay people, I feel that those straight people are the ones who are actually "less". It's like how stupid people think that other people(including intelligent ones) are more stupid than they are, when it is actually the stupid people who are the only ones who are really stupid.
A 'stupid' thermometer that measures only up to 100 degrees can measure only up to 100 degrees, that's only how high(low) it can measure.
Showing posts with label caring. Show all posts
Showing posts with label caring. Show all posts
Wednesday, August 12, 2015
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
Charlotte Ashton's Article on Misery City Singapore: The Accurate Word to Use Should Be Thoughtfulness Instead of Compassion -- Some/Many Singaporeans Don't understand What Thoughtfulness is
I read how quite a few people commenting in the local media(letter in TODAY, NTU students) who misunderstood Charlotte Ashton's BBC article where she describes Singapore to be a Misery City with a massive compassion deficit. They misunderstood her article and said that she should have asked for a seat if she wanted one. However, the point of her article wasn't about whether or not the seated commuters would really give up their seats if they were asked, but whether or not they had put in much thought in looking out for others' needs before others even ask for it(being thoughtful is more than being helpful), just like the thoughtfulness of the sensitive and gracious Singapore Girl(flight attendant in Singapore Airlines) being sensitive to what passengers need before they even ask for it. Being thoughtful of others is the same as being caring for them.
ANA seems to have got on SIA's tail:
Singer Stephanie Koh explains in a video about how the people in an Australia airport were thoughtful enough to ask about her laptop when she accidentally dropped it. That is the exact thoughtfulness that Charlotte was talking about in her article and what some locals still cannot understand to be missing. Being too subservient and lack of room for thinking freely for themselves and others have really made some/many Singaporeans stupid to not understand the meaning of being thoughtful of others.
Why I am not proud to be Singaporean
http://youtu.be/ydANJ5qLHG4?t=8m58s
The focus of Charlotte's article was on thoughtfulness/consideration that is why it discusses the reasons why commuters could lack thoughtfulness/consideration due to being too concerned with other matters such as earning money or being too concerned with themselves.
I feel that the word Charlotte used in her article to describe the commuters shouldn't be "compassion" since such a quality doesn't necessarily lead to the required physical help. A better more accurate word to use should be "thoughtfulness" or "consideration". The quality of being thoughtful or considerate can be recognized from a person's appropriate physical response to the needs of others.
Commuters on a train can have compassion but can fail to show it due to being distracted by their phones and therefore fail to react considerately/thoughtfully/appropriately/responsively/caringly to those who need a seat. But if they are thoughtful/considerate enough of those who might need a seat, they would choose not to be distracted by their phones but be constantly aware of those around them who might need a seat.
Having compassion is just one thing but having thoughtfulness/consideration can encompass compassion as well as having the constant awareness, adaptability and responsiveness so that one can respond considerately/thoughtfully/caringly to the needs of others.
Another example would be the people who are reading newspapers on the train who have much compassion but can fail to bring about any appropriate response from such compassion towards any needy person around them who might need a seat due to lacking thoughtful awareness by being too distracted with their paper. So even if people are innately compassionate, they can fail to evoke any considerate/kind/caring actions from such innate compassion if they choose not to be thoughtfully aware of those around them who might need a seat.
It is more important for commuters to have thoughtfulness/consideration that can lead to the appropriate physical response to those who need help in public, rather than just having innate compassion that may fail to come about to lead to an appropriate physical response to those who need help.
But whether or not Charlotte has used the right word to describe the commuters in her article, her experience still made her feel miserable about Singapore after all.
I wrote a blog post about Singaporeans being too subservient due to Asian upbringing, which is why I feel they can lack the skill and ability to be thoughtful for themselves and for other people's well-being.
ANA seems to have got on SIA's tail:
Singer Stephanie Koh explains in a video about how the people in an Australia airport were thoughtful enough to ask about her laptop when she accidentally dropped it. That is the exact thoughtfulness that Charlotte was talking about in her article and what some locals still cannot understand to be missing. Being too subservient and lack of room for thinking freely for themselves and others have really made some/many Singaporeans stupid to not understand the meaning of being thoughtful of others.
Why I am not proud to be Singaporean
http://youtu.be/ydANJ5qLHG4?t=8m58s
The focus of Charlotte's article was on thoughtfulness/consideration that is why it discusses the reasons why commuters could lack thoughtfulness/consideration due to being too concerned with other matters such as earning money or being too concerned with themselves.
I feel that the word Charlotte used in her article to describe the commuters shouldn't be "compassion" since such a quality doesn't necessarily lead to the required physical help. A better more accurate word to use should be "thoughtfulness" or "consideration". The quality of being thoughtful or considerate can be recognized from a person's appropriate physical response to the needs of others.
Commuters on a train can have compassion but can fail to show it due to being distracted by their phones and therefore fail to react considerately/thoughtfully/appropriately/responsively/caringly to those who need a seat. But if they are thoughtful/considerate enough of those who might need a seat, they would choose not to be distracted by their phones but be constantly aware of those around them who might need a seat.
Having compassion is just one thing but having thoughtfulness/consideration can encompass compassion as well as having the constant awareness, adaptability and responsiveness so that one can respond considerately/thoughtfully/caringly to the needs of others.
Another example would be the people who are reading newspapers on the train who have much compassion but can fail to bring about any appropriate response from such compassion towards any needy person around them who might need a seat due to lacking thoughtful awareness by being too distracted with their paper. So even if people are innately compassionate, they can fail to evoke any considerate/kind/caring actions from such innate compassion if they choose not to be thoughtfully aware of those around them who might need a seat.
It is more important for commuters to have thoughtfulness/consideration that can lead to the appropriate physical response to those who need help in public, rather than just having innate compassion that may fail to come about to lead to an appropriate physical response to those who need help.
But whether or not Charlotte has used the right word to describe the commuters in her article, her experience still made her feel miserable about Singapore after all.
I wrote a blog post about Singaporeans being too subservient due to Asian upbringing, which is why I feel they can lack the skill and ability to be thoughtful for themselves and for other people's well-being.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)